In the dialogue with Derrida entitled ‘Violence Against Animals’, Elisabeth Roudinesco brings up the ‘fact’ of Hitler’s vegetarianism precisely in the overdetermined terms so beloved of the humanist opponents of pro-animal activism (Luc Ferry, for example), in which vegetarianism is explicitly linked with the bad conscience of a deflected misanthropy: ‘from a psychoanalytic point of view, the terror of ingesting animality can be the symptom of a hatred for the living taken to the point of murder. Hitler was a vegetarian’ (‘Violence Against Animals’, 68). Aside from the patent absurdity of such thinking, it should be made known that Hitler was in fact not a vegetarian, but rather it was the case that he only seldom ate meat as it caused him physical discomfort (i.e. stomach pains and flatulence). Nonetheless, he continued to eat sausages throughout his life, and a favourite dish was fledgling pigeon. In addition, upon coming to power in 1933 he banned all vegetarian societies in Germany, arrested their leaders, shut down the main vegetarian magazine, and persistently persecuted vegetarians. During the war, all vegetarian organisations were banned throughout the occupied territories, even though, as Charles Patterson points out, ‘vegetarian diets would have helped alleviate wartime food shortages’ (Eternal Treblinka, 127). Historian Robert Payne writes that the myth of Hitler’s vegetarianism was a public relations exercise organised by Joseph Goebbels: ‘According to the widely believed legend, he [Hitler] neither smoke nor drank, nor did he eat meat nor have anything to do with women. Only the first was true. … His asceticism was a fiction invented by Goebbels to emphasize his total dedication, his self-control, the distance that separated him from other men. By this outward show of asceticism, he could claim that he was dedicated to the service of his people’ (cit. ibid. 127-8). What is perhaps more interesting is why this propaganda should continue to be promulgated with such insistence. Why, in other words, do people find it necessary to reiterate this myth ad nauseum, that is to say, what anxiety does this recycled ideology conceal?
October 4, 2011
But Hitler was (not) a vegetarian …
About Richard Iveson
Postdoctoral Research Fellow
I have a PhD from Goldsmiths College, University of London; my teaching and research interests include animal studies; Continental philosophy; posthumanism; cultural studies; biotechnology and cyberculture; post-Marxism.
Books;
Being and Not Being: On Posthuman Temporarily (London & Washington: Rowman & Littlefield International, 2016), forthcoming.
Zoogenesis: Thinking Encounter with Animals ( London: Pavement Books, 2014).
View all posts by Richard Iveson
This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 4th, 2011 at 1:00 pm and tagged with animal studies, Ferry, Hitler, Roudinesco and posted in Animals, Politics, Vegetarian/Veganism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Pages
-
Recent Posts
- Telling Tales in Troubled Times
- Matthew Calarco ‘Life and Relation Beyond Animalization.’ A Review of Zoogenesis: Thinking Encounter with Animals
- Some brief Notes on the Philosophy PhD Proposal
- Between Queer Ontology and Political Indistinction
- Book Review: On Judith Still’s Derrida and Other Animals: The Boundaries of the Human
- Toward an Imaginary Animal Studies
- Zoogenesis: Thinking Encounter with Animals Press Release
- “Whether There is Life or Not”: Triangulating Matter with Derrida, Meillassoux, and DeLanda
- Plato Between the Teeth of the Beast: full text of LSE public lecture
- The Protagorean Presumption and the Posthuman (Part Two)
- Freud’s Key Concepts: Summary and History
- The Protagorean Presumption and the Posthuman: Ceci n’est pas un calmar (Part One)
- Plato between the Teeth of the Beast: Animals and Democracy at the LSE
- Persephone Calls: Power and the Inability to Die in Plato and Blanchot
- Admitting the Indifference of Dogs
- The need to take care with Bernard Stiegler
- The Immense Work of Mourning: A Review of Jacques Derrida The Beast and the Sovereign, volume II
- “Whether There is Life or Not”: Dasein and the Vivacity of the Nonliving
- As different as life from nonlife: Aristotle’s multiplicity and Heidegger’s directive
- When the Refusal to Offend Offends: Philosophers and their Animals no.4, Elisabeth de Fontenay
- Plasticity and the living dead: Malabou reading Freud
- Displacing the imperialist fairytale: the tempting of William S. Burroughs
- Cannibals and Apes: Revolution in the Republic
- On the importance of Heidegger’s anthropogenesis, and of moving beyond it
- Why, despite the taming of Kafka, Jean-François Lyotard’s cat does not exist
- Cannibals, Apes, and the London Conference in Critical Thought
- Animal Oppression and the Holocaust Analogy: A Summary of Controversy
- The End of Humanity: Kant and the Death of God
- The Wrongs of Animal Rights
- Wo und Ob: Heidegger’s Rethinking of the Heideggerian Animal
- The Outrageous Guilt of Humanism
- Philosophers and their Animals – between Derrida and Rancière
- Animal Studies – Suggestions for Reading
- Philosophers and their Animals No.3(a): Jacques Derrida
- Philosophers and their Animals No.2: Martin Heidegger
- Strategic opposition to King Alfred’s new(ish) plans: Gil Scott-Heron, Malcolm X, and animal liberation
- Philosophers and their Animals No. 1: Alain Badiou
- But Hitler was (not) a vegetarian …
- Misreading Derrida: Stiegler, originary technicity, and the différance of différance
- Derrida’s vegan hors d’oeuvre: Politicians, rapists, and vaches à lait
- Foucault in the Slaughterhouse
- What is Zoogenesis (3)?: Derrida & Benjamin, introducing animal studies
- What is Zoogenesis (2)?
- What is Zoogenesis (1)?
Blogroll
Links to:
- Animal Liberation Front
- Animality
- Earth Liberation Front
- Institute for Critical Animal Studies
- K-punk
- Larval Subjects
- Minor Compositions
- National Fox Welfare Society
- New Cross Review of Books (NXRB)
- Radical Goldsmiths
- Revolutionary Cells Liberation Brigade
- Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC)
- The Paper
- Trinketisation
- University for Strategic Optimism (UfSO)
- Until All Are Free TV
Categories
- Animal liberation (14)
- Animal Rights (5)
- Animals (38)
- Aristotle (2)
- Bec (1)
- Blanchot (4)
- Catherine Malabou (2)
- Community (11)
- de Fontenay (1)
- De Landa (1)
- Derrida (24)
- Donna Haraway (1)
- Education (2)
- Education (1)
- Flusser (2)
- Foucault (3)
- Freud (5)
- Gil Scott-Heron (1)
- Heidegger (17)
- Humanism (14)
- Kafka (4)
- Kant (5)
- Lyotard (2)
- Matthew Calarco (1)
- Meillassoux (2)
- Nietzsche (10)
- Nihilism (5)
- Pedagogy (1)
- PhD study (1)
- Applying for a PhD (1)
- Proposals (1)
- Plato (8)
- Politics (25)
- Posthumanism (12)
- Psychoanalysis (4)
- Rancière (2)
- Research (2)
- Stiegler (3)
- Technology (4)
- Tyler (1)
- Uncategorized (4)
- University (1)
- Vegetarian/Veganism (4)
- Violence (9)
- William S. Burroughs (2)
- zoogenesis (1)
-
Archives
- October 2017
- October 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- October 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- March 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
Leave a comment